<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citizendium, a reliable Wiki?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fsumedia.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/210/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fsumedia.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/210/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:14:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: spiders8</title>
		<link>http://fsumedia.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/210/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>spiders8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsumedia.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/210/#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Perhaps this is the new beginning of another Wikipedia, but for the percentage of individuals who just don&#039;t care to contribute to Wikipedia because of its lack of &quot;no rules,&quot; this new resource Citizendium may be the best way for them to contribute to a &quot;more reliable resource&quot; and experience som good esteem about it. Students themselves, for example,in high school or college won&#039;t produce writings if it is &quot;bleed to death&quot; and criticized so to speak.  I say, let&#039;s give Citizendium a chance, and in time the contributors/stakeholders will decide how effective and needed it is as a web resource.  Not always, but sometimes new ideas work well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this is the new beginning of another Wikipedia, but for the percentage of individuals who just don&#8217;t care to contribute to Wikipedia because of its lack of &#8220;no rules,&#8221; this new resource Citizendium may be the best way for them to contribute to a &#8220;more reliable resource&#8221; and experience som good esteem about it. Students themselves, for example,in high school or college won&#8217;t produce writings if it is &#8220;bleed to death&#8221; and criticized so to speak.  I say, let&#8217;s give Citizendium a chance, and in time the contributors/stakeholders will decide how effective and needed it is as a web resource.  Not always, but sometimes new ideas work well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chutry</title>
		<link>http://fsumedia.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/210/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>chutry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsumedia.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/210/#comment-324</guid>
		<description>I agree with shenra here.  There doesn&#039;t seem to be any major reason to start a whole new wiki--the possible exception might be a specialist wiki, but even then, I think Wikipedia may already serve that purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with shenra here.  There doesn&#8217;t seem to be any major reason to start a whole new wiki&#8211;the possible exception might be a specialist wiki, but even then, I think Wikipedia may already serve that purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shenra</title>
		<link>http://fsumedia.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/210/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>shenra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsumedia.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/210/#comment-322</guid>
		<description>There is a lot of good work on Wikipedia...why reinvent the wheel...wouldn&#039;t it be wiser to revise Wikipedia articles than to try to create a new encyclopedia?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot of good work on Wikipedia&#8230;why reinvent the wheel&#8230;wouldn&#8217;t it be wiser to revise Wikipedia articles than to try to create a new encyclopedia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
